On 9th February, 2016, civil society organisations in Kenya isued a joint-statement (below) on the Committee on the Rights of the Child's Concluding Observations which expressed concern at the rapid growth of private schools providing low-quality education, including those funded through foreign development aid. In October 2015, the Right to Education Project raised the same concern in a report submitted to the Committee on the Rights of the Child on whether the UK could be in breach of its human rights obligations abroad through its support of private education, including in Kenya, through its overseas development aid. Read the full report, here and the press release here.
The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) published last week a report assessing the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child by the Government of Kenya. In these “Concluding Observations”, the Committee expressed its concern about the “Low quality of education and rapid increase of private and informal schools, including those funded by foreign development aids, providing sub-standard education and deepening inequalities”.
Further, the CRC urged the Kenyan Government to “Guarantee the legal right to free mandatory education for all, without direct or hidden costs”. It insisted that Kenya should, in doing so, “prioritize free primary quality education at public schools over private schools and informal low cost schools and regulate and monitor the quality of education provided by private informal schools in line with the Convention.”
According to Abraham Ochieng, from the East African Centre for Human Rights, “the mentioning of schools funded by foreign development aids offering substandard education in the CRC Concluding Observations demonstrates once again that achieving free quality education is a huge issue, in a context where some international donors such as the World Bank and the British development agency fund private fee-charging schools in Kenya”.
Teresa Mutua, from the Kenya Chapter of the International Commission of Jurists, added, “This is the furthest we’ve seen a UN Committee going in articulating Government’s role in promoting public education vis a vis private education in guaranteeing education for all. It’s an important reminder that the right to education guaranteed in the 2010 constitution must be implemented by the Government through prioritizing free quality education at public schools, and especially targeting the poor, vulnerable and marginalized in the society.”
James Njuguna, from Concern Worldwide, observed, “Children from poor households in informal settlement have to pay for sub-standard education yet they are the ones who need free quality primary education most to escape poverty, as the CRC rightly put it the current trend towards commercialization only serves to deepen inequalities in Kenya.”
The fact that the CRC highlighted the need to regulate private informal (also called “alternative) schools, could change of lives of thousands of Kenyan children living in informal settlements, where these schools are most prevalent. The Concluding Observations were published shortly after the Ministry of Education finally officialised new Registration Guidelines for Alternative Provision of Basic Education and Training (APBET). These guidelines are meant to facilitate the establishment, registration and monitoring these alternative schools.
Sylvia Mbataru, from the CRADLE, stated: “The Government needs to take the necessary actions to ensure that the quality of education being offered in all Kenyan schools meets the minimum standards. The recently published Guidelines are a first positive step, but the standards set for alternative schools are still lower than for normal public and private schools, which creates a very unfair two-speed education system.”
Pauline Vata, Executive Director of Hakijamii, emphasised: “It cannot be acceptable, and it is illegal, that children have access to lower-quality education just because they were born in informal settlements, this has over the years institutionalized discrimination! The Ministry of education must take all appropriate measures to ensure that the recommendations outlined in the recent concluding observations are fully implemented, and that that all Kenyan schools obey by similar quality standards.”
The Concluding Observations by the CRC also come against a background of mounting concerns over commercialisation of education in Kenya, and in Africa.
Kenya National Union of Teachers (KNUT) Secretary General Wilson Sossion insisted “In the last years, we have witnessed a growing support of the authorities to private schools, including private multinational companies that come to make profit out of poor Kenyan children. As the CRC recalls, this is not acceptable, and it violates the right to free quality education guaranteed in both the Kenyan constitution and international law ratified by Kenya.”
Concluding observations are a list of observations addressed to States by UN human rights committee of experts. After States such as Kenya have submitted their report explaining how they meet their international human rights obligations, they are given a list of issues, which they have three months to respond to. After the state submits a written response, the committee draws concluding observations to the states.
- The East African Centre for Human Rights: Abraham Ochieng, firstname.lastname@example.org, +254 710 117423, +254 701 670 090.
- The East African Centre for Human Rights: Margaret Wawira, Margaret@eachrights.or.ke, +254704242727, +254701670090.
- The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Ashina Mtsumi, email@example.com, +254717296319.
- The Concluding Observations of the CRC on Kenya: http://bit.ly/1SNEIRX
- Registration Guidelines for Alternative Provision of Basic Education and Training (APBET) http://bit.ly/1Qmecub
East African Centre for Human Rights
Economic and Social Rights- Hakijamii
Cradle, the Children Foundation
Kenya National Union of Teachers
International Commission of Jurists-Kenya Chapter
Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights