| [International obligations and access to remedies] | Regional treaties - Americas » |
| States | ACHR 1 | ART. 62 2 | ADD PROT 3 |
| Antigua and Barbuda | |||
| Argentina | |||
| Bahamas | |||
| Barbados | |||
| Belize | |||
| Bolivia | |||
| Brazil | |||
| Canada | |||
| Chile | |||
| Colombia | |||
| Costa Rica | |||
| Cuba | |||
| Dominica | |||
| Dominican Republica | |||
| Ecuador | |||
| El Salvador | |||
| Grenada | |||
| Guatemala | |||
| Guyana | |||
| Haiti | |||
| Honduras | |||
| Jamaica | |||
| Mexico | |||
| Nicaragua | |||
| Panama | |||
| Paraguay | |||
| Peru | |||
| Saint Kitts and Nevis | |||
| Saint Lucia | |||
| Saint Vicent and the Grenadines | |||
| Suriname | |||
| Trinidad and Tobago | |||
| United States of America | |||
| Uruguay | |||
| Venezuela |
---------- 1. American Convention on Human Rights, OAS, 1969 - "Pact of San José" 2. Recognition of the jurisdiction of the American Court on Human Rights. 3. Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, OAS 1988 - "Protocol of San Salvador" 4. It has accpeted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. 5. Accepted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. 6. Accepted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. 7. Accepted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. 8. Accepted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. 9. The ratification is understood without prejudice to those provisions of the Convention that might be in conflict with express precepts of the Political Constitution of the Republic. El Salvador recognizes the competence of the Court, in so far as this recognition is compatible with the provisions in the Constitution. 10. Accepted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. 11. Reservation: Article 8 (right to a fair trial) shall be applied in the Mexican Republic in the ways and according to the procedures contemplated in applicable provisions of the Political Constitution of Mexico and its enabling provisions. 12. Accepted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. 13. Denounced in 1998 14. Accepted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. 15. Accepted the competence of the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has violated the human rights set forth in the American Convention. |